factbat.com

In an article posted 24 February 2012 on the CNN website, a new shameless racist, Charles Garcia, spews incredible amounts of divisive -- and highly unethical -- race-bating, as he offers clearly inept and uninformed advice to Obama on how the sitting President can successfully detract from his abysmal record, and "win by a landslide in November".

He is quoted as saying that Barack Obama could win re-election by doing one thing alone; connecting with Latino voters. And he says this, regardless of the fact that he appears to believe that this connection would be little more than a deceptive ruse that would fold immediately following his swearing-in. Since Garcia, himself, admits that Obama's record does not suggest he can be trusted to follow through with the promises he will need to make in order to garner their biased support. And, for anybody with even one spark of sense, the fact is that Obama does not actually possess the sole authority to sway policies or political power in their favor in any significantly, demonstrable way whatever.

At least not legally.

Garcia's extremely lethargic, literary offering, titled "How Obama could win in a landslide", is literally saturated with disgusting, racial bias. And exposes him to be another in the millions of Democratic Party supporters who quite obviously possess absolutely no respect for truth, freedom, self determination, individual acheivement, morality, ethics, the United States Constitution, or this nation's citizenry as a whole.

While it is certainly true that over the years, various unethical and deleterious strategies have emerged from behind the political veil, it is quite telling whenever anyone suggests their open use, rather than decrying them as despicable, degrading and -- ultimately -- socially destructive to this society.

Garcia's article begins by reporting that Time Magazine's cover story argues "That Latino voters will cast the deciding vote in the upcoming election".

Which is nothing of a surprise, given that Time Magazine has devolved to little more than a propaganda rag and hard-left, liberal liturgy of precocious, postulation and pandemonious pandering. It is truly rare to ever find its pages readable -- for the stinking, mendaciuos billows of acrid petulance that rise from the fires it sets to them.

Garcia claims that Republicans have sealed their fate by not grandiosely -- and deceptively -- wooing Latino voters; likening the immigration issue to a yoke of "Kryptonite...around their necks".

He then goes on to "bet...Obama could win another term -- even if he loses key swing states". And he wagers these assertions on absolutely nothing other than his explicitely, expressed confidence that all Mexicans are nothing but idiotic racists who possess not one molecule of actual compunction, or self respect that would lead them to vote their conscience. But, on the contrary, will cast their ballot for one reason only -- protecting the collective desires and/or demands of their race alone, and at the expense of everyone else in this nation.

Garcia does not appear to notice, nor even give a rat crap, that there are more ethnicities in this nation than his feeble brain can even calculate.

The United States is the greatest nation on Earth, for the fact that there are an amazing array of liberty loving, hard working, egalitarian ethnicities and nationalities of people working daily to preserve its founding principles.

The collective net-worth of intelligence and personal experience emanating from, and coursing through, American society is a throttling engine of puissant and peerless practicality.

There are African American people from over thirty countries and tribes, with varying social and economic backgrounds. As well as White Americans in the form of Germans, Irish, Poles, Ukranians, Russians, Georgians, Australians, Lithuanians, Kurds, Austrians, Dutch, and other Scandinavians. There are Chinese, Japanese, Koreans, Thai and various other Asians and far easterners. There are Polynesians and Pacific Islanders from Tahiti, Hawaii, the Marshall Islands and more. There are Indians in the form of Jews, Iranians, Arabs, Saudis, Iraquis, Syrians, Egytpians and a whole host of other Middle Eastern peoples. There are Italians, French, Canadians and Spanish people. The list is tremendously long and magnanimously distinguished.

However, Garcia has the nerve to discredit the entire lot of this American citizenry, and claim their voice will never be heard above the raucus and racially radicalised din of Latino, political pressure. And even goes so far as to actually exalt himself to some personal post of predilection, his writings serving as 'advisor to this nation's Commander in Chief'.

He literally suggests that Barack Obama heed his seditious strategy of depracating discrimination and defamation. By pandering to Latinos alone, simply by guaranteeing them special treatment through the exertion of unwarranted and unconstitutional powers that the executive office does not possess, nor observe; in a bid to circumvent both State and Federal laws that are currently in place, and enforceable.

Yet, how can anyone expect anything more from a person such as Garcia's -- self-expressed, despicable and dishonorable -- ilk, than to believe that his sentiments are shared by a United States President who would sue Arizona for upholding the Constitution and enforcing the law in protection of its citizens' very lives and livelihoods?

Even more disturbing is that Garcia references a book written by Drew Westen, titled "The Political Brain: The Role of Emotion in Deciding the Fate of the Nation", and appears to subscribe to a veritable, theatrical doctrine of Democratic drama, obviously employed as a manipulative mechanism which derives its primary power from an expressed, public provocation of intellectual repression. Wherein the targets (unwitting voters) are essentially hypnotized with fulminating attacks on their psyche, and riled with fears and fantasies that the presenter hopes are capable of setting fire to their cerebral senses.

Garcia even quotes a lamentable line of utterly pathetic, pacifist politicking from the book, which states "People vote for the candidate that elicits the right feelings, not the candidate who presents the best arguments."

What a ferocioulsy moronic mentality Garcia is plagued by. To truly laud such mystical morass as the sole defining factor which drives the voting public's engagement of this nation's political theatre, is an alarmingly asinine extrusion of the peoples' motives and/or focus.

The aspirations of the people of this nation are an ever-evolving spectrum of largely principled and practical pragmatism. And, although there are a great many citizens whom inordinately ascribe to a rather fanatical mentality of inflexible determination, the rolls of firm-line, sober inellectuals and scientifically grounded scholars are growing rapidly. And they are not, in any way, swayed by the likes of hate-spewing, rhetorically racial and radical shock jockeys like the Barack Obamas and Charles Garcias of the world, whom incessantly whip the emaciated, worm infested and stinking carcass of braying bigotry they typically straddle.

There are literally hundreds of millions of voters in America whom can be counted-on to cast their ballot in defense of this nation's Supreme Law of the Land (the United States Constitution). And -- at this critical juncture in national deficit -- support a candidate who is a fiscal conservative, and honorable statesman who truly understands the nature of this country's role in the international commnunity, and its need to address its perilous debt crisis.

Yeah, a candidate that is dedicated to the principles of autonomy, which preclude such a person from ever overstepping the boundaries of the Executive office, and therefore, not blinded by indefensible ideology and Socialist sectarianism that would lead a president to execute his responsibilities with "emotion", or "passion". And certainly would never attrempt to pass laws demanding compulsory medical insurance, vaccinations and 'belief-restictive' contraception.

Garcia appears to revel in the fact that he believes America could, for another four treacherous years, find itself languishing under the leadership of a criminal who smokes crack and cigarettes. Has indiscrimate sex with men in limousines. Is responsible for at least two execution-style murders due to his sexual improprieties with choir boys at Jeremiah Wright's church. Was at the center of the Sunrise Equities real estate scandal. Is guilty of felony racketeering and voter fraud owing to his involvment with ACORN, and acquired his multimillion dollar home through unlawful means, and from a known felon, etc.

Furthermore, he believes this will happen simply because Obama can appeal to the "emotions" of illegal aliens. Which, when put into proper context, are criminals themselves. Albeit of a rather reduced capacity, when compared to Obama.

I, as do millions of Americans, somewhat sympathize with the plight of Mexican nationals, even though they may have entered the nation illegally. However, broad-based amnesty is an extremely irresponsible and illegal method of remuneration. And has become a clear 'complacency of character' within the United States Federal Government, due to the excessive pressure being applied by irresponsible Democrats who do not care one iota for the future of this country. They are only interested in the here, and now, and how it affects their daily bread, and their ability to retain positions of authority -- and thus ensure their continued engagement of actions which flout, and sodomize, the United States Constitution.

Illegal aliens must be dealt with on a case-by-case basis. In part because a generalized mixing of the methodology for granting citzenry, as a way of applying the law to excessive numbers of people, creates extreme levels of moral hazard. And on a multi-faceted, multi-cultural, multi-tiered basis that cannot, in an way, be reasonably monitored.

Which brings to bear the very real factor of Political Corruption. In that the majority of the politicians pushing for broad-based amnesty, do so out of a clear act of "conflict of interest". Because they are all literally drooling over the possibility of bringing into their fold, millions of indiscriminate, typically politically ignorant, and obsequious voters who would likely become their veritable, loyal "sheeple" for their entire life, due to these politicians showering them with "special treatment".

Furthermore, a significant portion of the Hispanic vote is likely to be severely skewed due to millions of illegal aliens now possessing state IDs and fake documentation. Another, racially biased, special treatment of Latinos -- activities of alleged compassionate sympathy, which have now circumvented this nation's democratic system -- that has been increasing over the last five, to seven years.

Barack Obama is anything but an American. This is a man who, as President of the United States, actually invited Felip Calderone to speak on Capitol Hill, and reprimand the American people for allegedly discriminating against Mexican nationals. When, he himself was the leader of one of the most corrupt and discriminatory governments in the western hemisphere.

In Mexico, that nation's constitution specifically prohibits anyone who is not Mexican from ever owning land, or voting, and considers Whites to be second class citizens...eternally. Their police force is rife with corruption and discrimination. The cities are havens for drug lords, gangs, kidnappers and extortionists. And most crimes are punished by the police officers, who demand cash, on the spot. Those who cannot, or will not, pay are typically hauled off to jail, and held for extended periods without charge or bail; in squallid, fetid conditions.

To top it all off. The average Mexican national is not escaping political oppression, genocide, civil unrest or chaos. No, they are just unhappy with the meager sustenance they cultivate and tolerate in their own lackadasical nation.

They are not starving or severely emaciated, like in some poverty stricken areas of the world. They just want a bigger piece of the pie, so to speak. Coveting a Hummer, or lavishly accessorized low-rider, and a two story house filled with flat screen TVs, DVD players, bass-booming stereos and modern appliances.

Thus, the government, for lack of a truly redeeming title, calls them "economic refugees". And even once they get here, and gain access to everything they want, they still demand more, and more, and more, and more. To an eventual catalyzing, systemic and seditious recalcitrance that sends them marching into the streets, demanding that the entire nation laud them and their kind simply for the fact that they are oooooo! "Latino!!!"

These people most certainly do not, in any way, share a common thread of "poverty" or "discrimination", or even "reduced opportunity". Nor are they confined to ghettos or slums.

However, the vast majority of them still, consistently, band together as a group. Not even as a patchwork demographic. No. Simply as a racially biased, openly discriminatory, often hateful, divisive, and yes, deceptive racial group of ranting, chanting, selfish, self-centered, and emotionally excasperated rebels, yelling "me, me, me, me ... MEEEEE!"

PERIOD!

Now, the government -- in the form of an ethnically deleterious tramp named Barack Obama -- appears to be gearing-up to mount an all-out quest for votes by attempting to tug at the heart-strings of law-abiding, unbiased, racially neutral, often patriotic, professional, politically involved, Constitutionally informed, multi-generational, illegal-alien attacked, and murderous-Latino-invaded American families and friends, with beguiling scripts of mere words of sensational emotion, in defense of a racially-charged group of people who will not, in any way, be reciprocating the favor with equally selfless votes for the principles and policies of inividuality, sovereignty, national duty, self-reliance, limited govenment, fiscal responsibility, and secure borders that rest of the people of America support.

Garcia also points out that to "deeply connect with Hispanic voters, any candidate needs to address the immigration issue by supporting comprehensive immigration reform (code for "broad-based amnesty"), and the Dream Act, which would provide citizenship for those who earn a college degree or serve two years in the military.

However, he makes no mention of the fact that any such policy shift that circumvents the laws which are currently in place, opens the door for excessive corruption and fraud. And draws both the military and universities into the immigration game. A systemic side-effect that is likely not something the majority of intelligent voters are too comfortable with.

Garcia also claims that this microscopic show of favoritism is a vital, first-step in earning the trust of Hispanic voters.

He mentions nothing of being an honorable and trustworthy candidate who will uphold, protect and defend the United States Constitution. Nor a candidate that has a stellar voting record in Congress (such as Ron Paul), and is famous for voting against excess and porkbarrel spending (such as Ron Paul). Or being a statesman who is incorruptible in his values and actions, and fights for the rights of ALL Americans, equally (such as Ron Paul). Or a presidential candidate who -- with his every breath -- exudes a character which proves he will never assume powers that are not Constitutionally afforded the Executive Office (such as Ron Paul).

No, Hispanics -- to hear Garcia say it -- are not the least bit concerned about fiscal conservatism, limited government, infastructure investment, securing free market capitalism, cleaning up government corruption, restraining the military to Congress approved action, and yes, securing the borders of this nation so that it remains a haven for law-abiding, freedom loving, nationally interested persons to "IMMIGRATE" to ... LEGALLY!

Sure, Garcia mouths the words "Hispanic voters who understand that the country needs strong border security". However, not only does he have no proof of such, border security is not actually -- per se -- the true issue at hand. Border security was never the "hot-button" issue on a scale even remotely equal to what "broad-based amnesty" has become. Or there would not be over 10 million illegal aliens in this country.

He then states that "we need a fair way to deal with ... the refugees who are working in this country and contributing to our society. It's a matter of respect."

Does he mean, like the respect they have not shown this nation. As they traffick tons of drugs, criminals, guns, sex slaves and humans across the border and flout this nation's laws and system by entering illegally?

Furthermore, just how are these illegals "contributing to our society"? It is really getting to be a tired and sanctimonious pile of prescient garbage for liberals to incessantly claim that Mexicans do the job other Americans either won't, or do not want to.

The fact is that the markets would begin an upswing simply by having the vegetables and fruit harvested by tax-paying, American citizens, rather than freeloading illegals who debase the system in a number of ways.

Such as exporting a significant amount of their earnings to Mexico, rather than spend them in the United States. Overcrowding hospitals where they are given free health care. Defrauding the Welfare and Social Security system, since their income is undocumented. Committing crimes at nearly 10 times the rate of the average legal citizens in their area. And the list goes on.

Garcia even suggests that Obama's strategy be one of outspending Republicans in "Spanish-language media". Obviously entirely unfazed by the fact that a vast number of Mexicans, not only do not speak English, they hate the language and typically match this proclivity with an equal hatred for this country and its values.

All one needs to do is canvass an area where Hispanic people are the majority of the population -- which is not very difficult since they typically collect together by race wherever they go -- and see Mexicans get rather testy and defensive when asked anything about the United States Constitution, or American history and values.

Many Hispanics have responded to this author with the statement "F--k the Constitution"

Garcia also says "Hispanics want to feel they are voting for an authentic leader".

However, this does not, in any way, ring true. Since an authentic leader will uphold the law. And would never do anything to attempt circumventing it, regardless of the situation. A true leader knows that excusing criminal behavior as a means of enforcing the law, is a completely illogical, insensible and dubious action, regardless of who does it. And only adds fuel to the flame.

A true leader respects the law, and will always engage his position, and his people, through the proper channels. Not habitually abuse the law with signing statements, refusals to recongize acts of Congress, offer people special treatment in exchange for support, attempt to redefine the law at his personal discretion and pleasure, etc, etc, etc.

Garcia also claims that Hispanics need to agree with a candidate's "world view". Claiming that "he needs to explain that the Democrat Party is a welcoming place for Hispanics, that this world view of America is that of a caring, responsible, family and that his political ideals are based in empathy and fairness."

Wrong again, Sappy Sue!

This nation is first-and-foremost an example of liberty and justice. And it is necessary that this nation lead by such example, or pay a dear cost in crediblity and conscience.

If the government in this country does not respect its own borders, and will not enforce its own laws, nor respect the will of its law-abiding, natural citizens, then every country on Earth will mistrust anything it does in matters both foreign and domestic.

In a world with countries in peril and turmoil, such as Syria, Egypt, Lybia, Iran and so forth, anyone foolish enough to believe that the international community truly gives a hoot about the petty concerns of this nation's illegal aliens is wearing his sphincter as a bowtie.

It is absolutely imperative that this nation be viewed as a strictly lawful republic, unfazed by blustering throngs of malcontents and seditious racists, liberals, criminals and border jumping neighbors. Or it cannot possibly expect to have any truly demonstrable dialogue with any of the current dictatorial and autocratic regimes that are oppressing and murdering their own people.

This nation has become a joke to so many iron fisted despots. And is losing credibility by the ton as nearly every second passes that it does not turn to cleaning its own house.

Garcia, quite literally, hasn't the mentality, nor the intellectual fortitude, of a ten-year-old ballerina. His prissy, pontificating and pompous preaching about official affairs is about as worldly as a Sesame Street skit. Except that Kermit the Frog and Miss Piggy are twice as informative, and ten-times more credible.

Not to mention, infinitessimally more entertaining.

Oddly enough, Garcia continues in his ignorant meanderings, offering even more nascent advice as he states "Once Obama has established a deep emotional connection with Latinos, he can connect directly to the heart of Latino voters with three simple messages."

Ironically, he then outlines three of the things Obama is known to have failed miserably at: The economy and jobs, Health care, and Education.

Remorsefully, I grow tired of this moron, and thus I will not take the time to re-visit the failures of Garcia's self-professed Messianic Leader. Except to say that Garcia's reporting of the fact that Obama "doubled the government's investment in scholarship and financial aid" during the recession, increasing the national deficit, and increasing the rolls of post-graduates who have no jobs -- and therefore cannot pay their student loans, is not doing Obama any favors.

Not to mention the fact that lowering requirements for entrance into universities weakens the professional sector, and often cultivates an atmosphere rich in scores of underachievers who then cheat their way through courses that they had no business taking in the first place.

Unfortunately, this also includes financial means, because the cost of education is regularly reflective of a university's accredidation, course curriculum and difficulty. And since the instuctors and professors are chosen accordingly, those most gifted are employed by the most arduous, and thus expensive, learning institutions.

In summation, Garcia perorates his indefensibly theatrical thesis by scuttling every last bit of his credibility over the careening deck of this sinking ship of foolishness, when he, not only deceptively denigrates the republican candidates, he boorishly evokes a juvenile mouthfull of cultural bias, raising the stereotypical pirates flag as the sails tug at his grounded keel, taunting his professed flock of Hispanics, saying "Republicans may blow hard ... affection for Hispanics, munching on burritos in the barrio on the campaign trail, but the ... authenticity of leadership and strong record crucial to the Latino vote are just not there."

Going on to futher drown himself in the depths of incredulity, stating "The GOP doesn't have the deep connection with the Latinos necessary to pull off a win in November."

What an absolutely despicable, race-bating and remedial pile of steaming cow dung Garcia has shown himself to be.

That, and the fact that showing favoritism to Latinos may very well turn out to be just the thing that sinks any candidate's chances of garnering the support needed, from the growing number of voters who are sick-and-dog-blamed-tired of this type of pacificating -- and invariably deceptive -- politics, to defeat the veritable flag-burning man they never considered their president in the first place.