- Light is such meager supplement for life's wicked shadows, darkness is where flowers bloom. ...factbat
- The prevailing conspiracy is ignorance. ...factbat
- In a world of ideals, be they vengeful or vain, winning is the greatest defeat we sustain. ...factbat
Entries in hate (2)
In preparation for the upcoming debate in Arizona, A recent article, published Tuesday on the CNN website, by what appears to be a completely ignorant and blind -- rather than simply nearsighted -- black racist named LZ Granderson, literally transposes hate and divisiveness directly onto the page, as he accuses Republican presidential candidates of ulterior motives in their bid to preserve this nation's sovereignty and liberty.
The article, titled "Does 'secure the border' mean 'keep America white'?", indefensibly attacks whole demographics of people, and the entire Conservative, Republican field of persons and ideals, with nothing more than a simpleton's, fanatical viewpoint of "White People".
Granderson (how fitting a name) grandiosely claims that everyone should be prepared to understand that, in the debates, when Republicans use the term "job creator", it is just another term for either "rich people" or "the guy bankrolling my super PAC".
His hard-left, limp-wristed liberalism then comes screaming from the pages, even more so, as he devalues nearly every hard-working, family oriented, traditionally valued American in this nation when he deceitfully and bombastically claims "When someone says 'family values' that is to remind the audience that they don't like gay people."
Moreover, so what if they don't. It is anyones right to not like whomever they wish. Even if somebody doesn't like 'gay people', who's business is it? Does Granderson truly intend to posit that it is his job to expose what somebody "likes or doesn't like", as some form of remunerative discrimination? Does he seek reprisal or alienation of those who don't like something or someone that he believes should be liked?
Is Granderson some sort of brown-shirted, thought police who would love to burn this nation's founding documents, and place every citizen in a detentive state of denial and secrecy for the actions of a Socialist, Democratic party of petrified angst? Ruling with a gestapo strategy of force beyond control. Feeding a paranoia machine and forcing the entire nation into robotic compliance with his personal -- and obviously severely delusional -- brand of freedom?
This guy is a nepotist pissant fornicating with cultural loopholes, raping the pages of information with obscenity and attempting to push his flaccid agenda on an entire nation through an oft-trusted -- however unwittingly -- news agency. Remarkable.
Granderson also claims that when Republicans say the words "religious freedom" they are merely employing some sort of covert, 'double-speak' that actually means "Christianity". Then goes on further slithering through the gutter stating "It's not really a GOP debate until a candidate attacks the 'liberal media' for asking questions they are too afraid to answer"
As if it is only Republicans whom evade, or refuse to answer, questions from the public. All politicians routinely clam up about sensitive issues, inquiries into their improprieties, or questions concerning their credibility.
Except, of course, the 20 year congressman from Texas, Dr. Ron Paul. Who consistently welcomes debate. Which is why the majority of the media, liberal or otherwise, avoids him like a contagion.
Furthermore, there is not one Democrat in the government, liberal or otherwise, who even comes close to Dr. Paul's honorable, and tenacious character.
Granderson should approach one of his Democrat idols at a publicly televised event sometime, and ask him or her to elaborate on the government's official accounts of the events of September 11, 2001. And see how they react.
It is not just Republicans who are hiding the truth about that day, or avoiding debate into the specifics of the structural inconsistencies apparent in the official reports released by a hand-picked panel, and based on a severely slip-shod investigation.
Granderson has -- quite literally -- a trench of toilet trappings for a mind (i.e. crap for brains). And apparently, little, if any compunction where the reporting of facts are concerned.
His assessments reek of bias and personal pacification. Not to mention, a clearly obsequious nature that finds him all-to-willing -- if not daily begging -- to play lap-dog for the liberal machine of lies and lethargy.
One rather morbid, yet somewhat redeeming, factor of his sordid and sanctimonious proclivities, is that his mendacious masters will sink a knife deep into his spineless back, if he ever exposes it to them.
But I digress.
Even more remarkable, is that the Democratic Party, and obviously CNN, stand shoulder to shoulder with this moronic buffoon.
It is a mystery how CNN actually found it conscionable to publish, and support, this sub-human's rapacious rant. Especially given the fact that it bears not one molecule of actual intuition. Nor even a reasonably defensible suspicion for his assertions, that is based on any form of, remotely, credible evidence.
Granderson's indictments do not even fly in the air-space of the neighboring zip code of reality or honesty. And this guy is labeled a "journalist"?
Furthermore, he has allegedly earned awards for his literary endeavors. Of course, it was from an organization of gays and lesbians. Which, actually, should throw-up more than a few red flags, for its obvious implications of discriminatory -- and personally derived -- biases.
Granderson also uses the term "illegal immigrants" when there is no such thing. They are either "illegal aliens" or they are "immigrants". You can't have both. Illegal aliens are criminals, period. And generally do not, in any way, understand the American system, nor care to. And certainly have no intention of properly assimilating into this society.
An American immigrant is a person who enters the United States legally. And voluntarily complies with the requirement that they learn this nation's Constitution, its laws, and its political and social system. And then take an oath to abide by said Constitution, laws and system.
This is what "secure the borders" means. And it is an extremely critical method necessary to properly preserve the sovereignty and system of any nation. Not merely the United States.
Granderson also goes on to claim that "secure the border" is "slang for 'keep the Mexicans out'". Regardless of the fact that there are millions of legal Mexican immigrants living in this nation. And the majority of them also agree with securing the borders -- southern and northern -- and requiring that anyone, including their Mexican friends, enter this nation legally.
His torpid presentaion of the facts, wherein he distorts them with an idiotic implication of racial bias, is one of the most deleterious and deceptive forms of myopic truth-manipulation to be spouted lately by the liberal, literary lynch-slobs that are gorging themselves at the swine trough of pompous propaganda and race-bating in America.
Of course "securing the border" does often mean -- in the most basic literal sense -- preventing Mexicans from crossing the border illegally. But this is owing to the nature of the "security" parameters necessarily in place, since it is determined on a case-by-case basis, and Mexicans are almost the only people entering by jumping the southern fence.
Like a foolish sycophant, and nascent, nelly of neutered nonchalance Granderson then goes on to set a match to the fuse protruding from his sphincter when -- speaking of himself -- he proclaims "Oh boy, here comes the black guy playing the race card again".
"Wrong two-tone. You are a blight on this planet. A corrosive, catalyst of ill-witted, ill-fitted moronic puss, oozing from the festering hemorroid that is inflaming those of the collective anus of this species."
Granderson would be a worthless troll if it weren't for the fact that his ignorant, misplaced negativity and truculent angst is a degrading, drag on society. Sucking the life and light out of anything he can touch with his filthy, fabricated form of anal retentive "free speech".
This person is so much less than merely "worthless".
Granderson finishes the preceding statement by saying "Yep, that's me -- pointing out that the Canadian border is largely ignored in this dialogue".
However, Granderson is again, severely misguided in his assessment of the facts. If he had merely desired to voice his opinion that the security of the Canadian border was being ignored, he could have easily accomplished that task without ever having "played the race card" as he, himself, admitted to doing.
Nor would Granderson have ensconced his article with such an inflamatory and hateful title, if he were merely concerned about national security.
No, this pig just wanted to attack white people. And believes that he should be afforded the right to hate. Presenting a paucity of relevance as he pretends that the color of his skin places him in a discounted realm of remuneration for what some others of his kind may have had to suffer.
He is an opportunist. A cowardly burden of entitlement mentality that this nation could easily do without. His use of the border issue, and illegal immigration, as a bully pulpit to spread his acrid vocal flatulance across this country is pitiful.
Furthermore, the northern border is a much more secure line of defense for this country, than is the southern one. Simply due to its location and landscape. It is doubtful that Granderson has ever been anywhere near it, since he appears to be completely ignorant to the fact that crossing the border that separates the United States from Canada can be a rather treacherous task if one chooses to use a route other than the few roads that are secured by checkpoints.
That is why the majority of illegal contraband coming out of Canada is flown in by low-flying aircraft.
Not to mention the fact that the Canadian Government typically enforces quite strict requirements, merely to enter that country for a visit, on one of the highways, or waterways. And there aren't many people who possess the ability, or the means, to covertly navigate a sea-going vessel into Canadian waters with the intention of landing on her shores illegally, and then crossing the border -- again covertly -- into the United States.
Granderson indefensibly bemoans, in his article, the security of the northern line as he alleges "The attention we give the northern border is miniscule at best when compared to resources we allocate to the south". Obviously insinuating that this is due to a racial bias against Mexico, or more insipidly "Mexicans".
Guessing from his comments, this guy would likely light a fire under his grandmother's dress if he felt it would get him some attention. His is the kind of sadistic, septic-schism (get it, skepticism?) that the lopsided left dreams-up in their typically drunken, drug induced fallacies of frenetic frankenlogic. Gawking in wild-eyed glee, their hands wringing passionately, as they revel in the carnage and obscenity inspired by their insensible impetus and perverse patronization of the recalcitrant and malcontented.
(While it is said that Michael Chertoff alleges he was more afraid of terrorists coming into the country through Canda's border, and that they arrested more people connected to Al Qaeda and Hesbollah trying to come in from up north than from down south. It is strange that Granderson uses his words to indemnify his position. Since Chertoff worked for those he says are merely racists and liars.
Moreover, this makes no mention of just how many people were detained. Was it three? ... five? ... twenty five? And who's to say just how many terrorists crossed the southern border in making a comparison? A skewed figure would not be difficult to accomplish since, for many years, it was rare for anyone to be arrested crossing the southern border.
At any rate, this information comes from an administration that wanted to build the Grand Texas Corridor so that they could import millions of tons of drugs and contraband without being detected. And also was responsible for the invasion of Iraq under known false pretenses.
Granderson can't have it both ways. Either he is against their policies and believes them to be lying, cheating, corrupt thieves, racists and elitists, or he doesn't. But he obviously hear's only what he wants to hear.
Granderson, in his article, also details various drug busts and discoveries of security breaches along the Canadian border. Such as reports that allege the "amount of marijuana seized at the Canadian border jumped 22% from 2007 to 2009", and that "Homeland Security has seen a sharp increase in the trafficking of more dangerous drugs such as heroin, cocaine and ecstasy." Going on to say that the DEA "also found a 360-foot drug tunnel from a hut in Canada to a house in the state of Washington."
Which, as he so easily ignores, proves that the security of the northern border is actually being taken seriously, and that this seriousness has resulted in a long list of trafficking and illegal immigration arrests that have occurred there.
He also ignores the fact that the drug, and human, trafficking occurring on the southern border is far more than 100 times the amount occurring on the northern border. Which means that the relative dearth of seizures-per-event in the south nets a percentage that is much lower than in the north. Thus proving that it is the southern border, by comparison, that is being severely neglected.
Granderson also claims that the drug trafficking across the Canadian/American border has been completely obscured by racial bias, when compared to the government's focus on the Mexican/American border. And uses this analogy to succintcly derive his theory of discrimination and profiling being perpetrated against Mexicans.
However, he fails to realize that this trend owes its popularity, if you will, to the fact that there are a lot of powerful people, and a great many citizens, whom choose -- however irresponsibly -- to be distributors and consumers of these drugs. Thus placing said drugs in much higher demand than Mexicans. And, by default, creating a more permeable Canadian border.
The very real truth of the matter, is that the southern border has also been allowed to become inordinately insecure and ignored -- as have been the eastern and western shores, and air spaces at times -- due to the great demand for drugs in America. And the lucrative, all cash, business they create. This is why so many illegal aliens were able to cross undetected; either carrying the drugs, behind the drugs, or simply in close proximity to them. The criminal 'powers that be' were intentionally preventing border agents from doing their job. Either by reducing their numbers, or merely bribing and co-opting them.
It is simply the mathematics and schematics of "supply and demand" that caused this tip of the scales, so to speak. Not a racial bias, as Granderson ignorantly insists.
Granderson also has the nerve to broach the dispassionate topic of "the browning of America" that may, or may not, be occurring. And refers to it as if it is some pervasive social interest of bigoted manipulation. Even claiming that "white people are terrified of it."
When, in reality, race has always been an unbiased and relative issue in America for a majority of people. Due to the fact that this country is a haven for immigrants. And, as such, must take great care to ensure that the social scales are structurally proportionate, according to a number of relative factors.
This is not merely a racial issue. It is also one of geo-political, economic, cultural, genetic and environmental standards based on the various proclivities of each group of people that find themselves residents of a nation that is the only one of its kind on the planet.
To completely ignore the ethnicity and nationality of the people who live in a melting-pot such as this nation would be extremely irresponsible. Primarily because racial hatreds and divides are an pervasive problem across much of this planet. And there are various races that are more prone to act collectively aggressive than others.
Furthermore, there are millions of immigrants in this nation whom derive their personal and political ideals from the fractured and failing nation they came here to escape from. Yet, do not realize that their nation's system was fatally flawed. And also do not respect this nation's Constitution or ideals enough to properly assimilate into American society. And definitely cannot be counted on to uphold, protect and defend said Constitution and ideals when there comes the time that the proverbial "chips are down".
Hopefully not one person in this great nation is actually stupid enough to fall for Granderson's shamelessly racist -- and insensitively ignorant -- rhetoric, with his juvenile, yet geriatric jab at white people. Who, by the way, gave everything, for centuries, to create the atmosphere that allowed them to eventually risk it all as they fought to mechanize the political and social constucts that Granderson obviously has absolutely no understanding of, nor respect for.
His haphazard and hypocritical harkening to Democrats, attempting to rile them with sensationalism and spineless sarcasm, prove him to be a truly treacherous part of what can only be seen as another fickle facet of the corrosive problems caused by the sexually depraved, deceptively deleterious and back stabbing liberals attempting to turn this nation into their own personal brothel.
What a scholastically, schizophrenic pile of human garbage.
"Hey Granderson. The southern border is still porous enough for you to jump the fence. You most certainly will not be missed by anyone who matters. But be forewarned, since you are not Mexican, they will never let you own property there, and you will always be considered a second class citizen in more ways than you can count. How's that for discrimination ... you fool?!! "
A story on YahooNews.com (originally airing on Channel 2 News, Chicago) tells the tale of a Chi Town man who is in possession of video that portrays what he claims is a neighbor lady stealing his snow shovel yesterday, or at least simply borrowing it and possibly not returning it. And he actually decided that the best thing to do was bury the lady's car in snow with his snow blower; because he believed himself to have been slighted to the point that revenge was justifiable. (YahooNews.com)
However, it appears now - as more of the story comes out - that the tool was later found leaning against his garage. But that is not really the issue. What is important is that the man actually moved to aggression rather than conflict. Proving himself to be a coward. The logical response is to confront the woman and ask did she need anything more, or did the shovel help? And then politely ask where she left it.
Given that this author does not appear to be able to access the realms of petty, deplorable sub-human behavior that currently appears to exist in a significant number of people's psyches these days, it comes as quite a shock that anyone would go to the lengths that this person did, simply to satisfy their own hatred.
Self-centered and pitiful acts such as vandalism and other reprisals do not do anything but promote depraved animosities which will do little more than add fuel to the flame, and thereby increase the likelihood that such incidences will occur, and in an escalated fashion. The actions by the man were extremely narrow-minded and disturbing, not to mention juvenile.
Even worse, is the fact that his prank has been aired on national television over and over again throughout the day, and appears to be something that, not only is the allegedly slighted "Mr. Moody" proud of, is also being viewed as a laudable "tit for tat".
Truly, this has got to be one of the more sick display's of waning human compunction since Michael Vick was caught abusing poor, defenseless animals for his own twisted pleasure. Oh, and a little crass cab-fare to boot. Of course, he then lied his hat off about it to save his own hide, but what would one expect from such an individual?
This author is a proud ex-Illinois resident who lived in the "City of Big Shoulders" for years, and was often impressed with the way people would show various facets of a generous and tolerant nature in such situations. But this man exuded that sentiment in no way whatever. What a shame.
I will not go so far as to name the pompous, prissy self-professed puissant who obviously wouldn't know a real man if it bit him. But I will say that he is fortunate a more protective pragmatist was not there to witness him bury the woman's vehicle, or he would not have been allowed to sit and gloat while the poor lady struggled in the freezing weather for seven hours, digging her car out. Because he would likely have been persuaded to do it himself, by this conscientious character; who, incidentally, would also have assisted him with his educational chore, and then shook his hand and requested that he try to please think a bit more clearly the next time his anger gets the better of him.
Story on Channel 2 News,Chicago. Found on Yahoonews.com @ . http://news.yahoo.com/video/chicagocbs2-15750637/snow-revenge-caught-on-video-24111655