factbat.com

So, it appears that America is expected to heed dietary advice from the likes of ignorant and moronic buffoons like Charles Barkely. Who, not only completely denigrates and decieves an antire demographic of adult males, by claiming that "steak and pizza" are "man food" (what a prick!). But also pretends that exposing his transvestite proclivities opens up some new realm of credibility. As if dressing in drag has anything to do with enabling a full-spectrum field of personal vision.

There is not a man alive who needs to find a "feminine side" to his character, simply to avoid some allegedly myopic misunderstanding of his role within the human social arenas of this species.

Nor do men require "man food". The body of both males and females are identical in their nutritional requirements, regardless of what foolish fallacies are meant to lead people to believe otherwise.

Who gives a rat crap what Charles Barkely says about most anything? Especially about dietary requirements of the human body.

Barkely is not a nutrition specialist, nor anything even remotely akin to an educated professional in the areas of health and human diet.

Furthermore, Weight Watchers is nothing more than an exploitative and asinine bunch of self-serving jackasses who's only objective is to recruit as many irresponsible and weak minded persons as inhumanely possible, into their ranks, with deceptive and pandering propaganda bent on convincing their victims that their dietary choices have absolutely no effect on their weight.

The objective of the company is quite obviously directed at obscuring absolutely every area of human health and healing. And instead is intended to create dietary schematics which clearly exist outside of the perameters of "edible", by characterizing each selection in terms of "tolerability" within the human body.

Even if some reasonably healthy person did actually lose weight by eating their food -- which is highly unlikely -- the lack of healing properties in the items offered by WW will certainly decrease any such person's energy levels, mental clarity, and life span. Among other things.

Charles Barkely was being perfectly honest when he inadvertently exposed his personal opinion that collecting a paycheck from Weight Watchers for his job as a spokesperson "was a scam".

Moreover, he was entirely correct in his analysis of the role he plays for the company.

Anyone who intends to continue eating the chocolate cake, charred, cheese smothered dead aminal flesh and overprocessed, perservative tainted and poisonous offerings that the majority of food companies sell as "food", will continue to place themselves, and the world around them, at extreme risk of death and debilitation as a result of both obesity and toxic syndromes.

Weight Watchers is proposing to sell people a "get out of jail free" card. Promising their targeted customers a life free of the natural realms of cause and effect. Clearly insinuating that people are not responsible for their own behaviors. But, on the contrary, are merely victims of their food, and thus must do battle with, and protect themselves from, every meal they ever consume.

Hey Weight Watchers -- and yes, you too Barkely -- "cut the effing crap, and 'man up' by choosing a big salad, some vegetarian soup and a glass of water."

And leave the rest of us in peace!

Or continue being a total jerk-off, by lying to, and brow beating, everyone with deleterious directions intended to belittle people into buying your despicable products.

Both have consequences. You decide which you are comfortable dealing with.

But don't blame anyone but yourself for what you get.